AFL's new drug policy divides coaches over player mental health risks

The AFL’s updated illicit drugs policy has sparked concern among senior coaches over player welfare. Western Bulldogs coach Luke Beveridge warned the new rules could weaken clubs’ ability to support players’ mental health. Under the changes The policy now restricts senior coaches from receiving details about players’ drug-related issues. Only medical staff, psychologists, and club executives will retain access to this information. Breaches of confidentiality could lead to fines as high as $250,000.

Beveridge criticised the shift, arguing it undermines the club’s duty of care. The Western Bulldogs, previously ranked in the lower tier for mental health spending, have since expanded support options. Some players have turned to singer and life coach Josh Piterman, while the club’s official psychologist, Andrew Waterson, remains a key resource. Other coaches have weighed in on the debate. Melbourne’s Steven King stressed the need to protect young men both in football and beyond. His club employs former NBL champion David Stiff as their psychologist, focusing on performance and wellbeing. Meanwhile, Gold Coast coach Damien Hardwick defended the AFL’s approach, calling its player support system the best globally. The policy’s impact on mental health remains a central issue. Clubs now face the challenge of balancing privacy with the need to provide timely care for struggling players.

The AFL’s stricter confidentiality rules have left coaches divided over their effects on player welfare. While some praise the league’s support structures, others fear the changes will create barriers to early intervention. The policy’s success may hinge on how well clubs adapt to the new restrictions while maintaining effective mental health support.